This study examined functions of self-motion and visual cues in updating people's actual headings in multiscale spaces. In an immersive virtual environment, the participants learned objects' locations inside two misaligned rectangular rooms by locomoting within and between the rooms. In each testing trial, the participants locomoted to adopt an actual perspective in one room, and then they judged relative direction to a target from an imagined perspective in the other room (remote perspective taking). The imagined and actual perspectives had the same or opposite cardinal directions (globally aligned or misaligned) or had the same or opposite orientations defined by room structures (locally aligned or misaligned). Global or local sensorimotor alignment effects mean that performance is better when imagined and actual perspectives were globally or locally aligned than when misaligned. We examined these effects to infer updating actual headings in global or local representations. The results showed local but no global sensorimotor alignment effect. By contrast, there were both global and local sensorimotor alignment effects when the participants judged across-room relative headings prior to remote perspective taking. These results indicate that people update headings in local representations based on visual similarities between local spaces. People update headings in global representations based on self-motion cues available in across-boundary navigation, but updating headings globally requires tasks to activate global-relevant sensorimotor representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Comparative studies can help identify selective pressures that contributed to species differences in the number and composition of personality domains. Despite being adapted to an aquatic lifestyle and last sharing a common ancestor with primates some 95 million years ago, bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) resemble nonhuman primate species in several behavioral and cognitive traits. For example, like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), dolphins live in fission-fusion societies, use tools, and have relatively large brains. To determine the extent to which these and other factors contribute to the evolution of dolphin personality, we examined personality structure in 134 bottlenose dolphins. Personality was measured in 49 dolphins using a 42-item questionnaire, and in 85 dolphins using a version of the questionnaire that included 7 additional items. We found four domains. Three-Openness, Sociability, and Disagreeableness-resembled personality domains found in nonhuman primates and other species. The fourth, Directedness, was a blend of high Conscientiousness and low Neuroticism and was unique to dolphins. Unlike other species, but like humans, dolphins did not appear to have a strong Dominance domain. The overlap in personality structure between dolphins and other species suggests that selective pressures, such as those related to group structure, terrestrial lifestyles, morphology, and social learning or tool use are not necessary for particular domains to evolve within a species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study individual differences in innovative behavior in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behavior, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid Rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovative were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Age, sociality, and task motivation all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance, and group size were nonsignificant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioral observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may, therefore, be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).We tested learning and behavioral flexibility in family-living gidgee skinks (Egernia stokesii) using a multistage visual discrimination task that included acquisition and reversal stages using simple and compound stimuli composed of black shapes superimposed on a colored background. We evaluated how lizards learn compound cues through a probe test. Lizards showed behavioral flexibility through reversal learning using simple stimuli (only color or shape). Our lizards used compound stimuli to learn a discrimination but had problems reversing and generalizing across novel compound stimuli. In the probe test, lizards chose the correct stimulus in a novel pairing with a distractor feature even without previous experience with compound stimuli. Our results suggest that some lizards are likely able to attend selectively to the relevant features of our compound stimuli while ignoring irrelevant features instead of using the configuration of a cue card as a whole to learn to discriminate between compound stimuli. We hope that our work will spark interest in further studies looking at how lizards (and reptiles in general) learn to solve visual discrimination problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Psychological Bulletin has long enjoyed a reputation as a source for what research has revealed about psychological phenomena; it maintains a prestigious position of leadership in psychological science and for science at large; it publishes evidence syntheses that are the most comprehensive and rigorous reviews available; it informs theorists and practitioners. I am duly honored to be selected as its editor; accordingly, my goal is to guard this tradition and, to the greatest extent possible, improve the rigor and transparency of submissions. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/MK-1775.html Incorporating advances in evidence synthesis methods will help ensure that the Bulletin retains its esteemed position. Thus, I encourage the strongest possible scholarly evidence syntheses addressing central psychological issues. It is important to use contemporary methods for evidence synthesis because evidence syntheses are a form of metascience, using science to understand trends in science. Stronger methods have the potential to reduce error and the play of chance, making conclusions more trustworthy.